The economics of Dean Baker and Paul Krugman versus the economics of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld

The economics of Dean Baker and Paul Krugman
versus
the economics of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld

Nipawin -Tuesday, November 20, 2001 - by: Mario deSantis

Pinochet

"General Pinochet [the Chilean dictator] has supported a fully free-market economy as a matter of principle. Chile is an economic miracle."--Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate in Economics

atrocities

"I have seen no evidence in my 24 years in Congress of one instance where because of American military involvement with another military that the Americans have stopped that foreign army from carrying out atrocities against their own people."
--Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA)

bubble
Economist Dean Baker has found that the boom of the 90's was due to the illusionary wealth created by both the bubble in the stock market and by the undue consumption of foreign goods and services related to the U.S. foreign trade deficit.

oil-hog
At the same time, economist Paul Krugman is telling the Bush administration that the country cannot sustain an economy based on high consumption of oil as the U.S. imports close to 50% of its domestic needs and as the price of oil is intrinsically affected by a pattern he calls the 'oil-hog cycle,' the hogs being the Arab sheiks, Texas millionaires and other people who don't need more money.

prop up
Especially in the last ten years, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board's monetary policies have had the effect to prop up the stock market and to further shift the wealth from the poor to the rich. The continuation of the U.S. dependence on foreign oil has been the main reason for the U.S. to have its troops stationed in the Middle East.

devaluate
In order to partially correct the present economic anomalies Dean Baker has suggested the need to devaluate the U.S. dollar. This devaluation would eventually effect the balancing of the foreign trade deficit along with the opportunities for developing countries to buy more from the U.S. and have a fairer exchange of goods and services. In addition, Paul Krugman recommends that the Bush administration pursue an energy policy of conservation and diversification.

Chicago
School
But the economic reality is so much different from what Dean Baker and Paul Krugman are proposing, and in fact both President George Bush Jr. and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld are strong proponents of the Chicago School of Economics, the school which produced Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman and with this noble man the beginning of the Free Market and Corporate Globalization.

present
crisis
President Bush is still tinkering with the idea to have his oil friends drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. More importantly, in light of the present crisis of international terrorism, the Bush administration is pushing the vision of the Free Market by bringing wars and victories rather than to follow a vision of Fair Market by bringing peace and justice.

agenda
As the U.S. pushes the Free Market agenda of the transnational corporations so the U.S. defends this Free Market by beefing up its military power at home and abroad. The Free Market agenda supporting the property and intellectual rights of the transnational corporations will take care of the U.S. foreign trade deficit, and a foreign trade surplus will be created as more military exports will fatten the pockets of the few and privileged.

54% of
all arms
sold by
United
States
The social and economic implications of the proliferation of arms and the hegemony of the U.S. can be appreciated by the following statistics:

Pentagon expenditure were $295 billion in 2000, could hit $375 billion in 2001 and could reach $400 billion in 2002

The United States supplied arms or military technology to more than 92% of the conflicts under way in 1999

1999 world military expenditures topped $780 billion. While at the same time an estimated 1.3 billion people survive on less than the equivalent of U.S. $1 a day

The U.S. share in world arms exports rose from 35% in 1990 to 54% in 1999

---------------References

The Chicago boys and the Chilean 'economic miracle.' Pinochet and Chile: Dedicated to Pinochet's victims around the world http://www.lakota.clara.net/myths/economy.html

The Facts of militarization, Federation of American Scientists http://www.fas.org/asmp/fast_facts.htm

THE NEW ECONOMY GOES BUST: WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS, by Dean Baker, October 29, 2001 http://www.cepr.net/new_economy_goes_bust.htm

The Oil-Hog Cycle, by Paul Krugman, November 18, 2001, The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/18/opinion/18KRUG.html

Recognize the link between oil, war, SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD, November 18, 2001 http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/opinion/47010_energyed.shtml

Runaway Pentagon spending will do more harm than good. The arms companies must be happy. By Frida Berrigan and William D. Hartung, October 23, 2001 http://www.progressive.org/pmp0701/pmpbo2301.html



The economics of Dean Baker and Paul Krugman versus the economics of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld

Nipawin -Tuesday, November 20, 2001 - by: Mario deSantis

Pinochet	"General Pinochet [the Chilean dictator] has supported a fully free-market economy as a matter of principle. Chile is an economic miracle."--Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate in Economics

atrocities	"I have seen no evidence in my 24 years in Congress of one instance where because of American military involvement with another military that the Americans have stopped that foreign army from carrying out atrocities against their own people." --Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA)

bubble	Economist Dean Baker has found that the boom of the 90's was due to the illusionary wealth created by both the bubble in the stock market and by the undue consumption of foreign goods and services related to the U.S. foreign trade deficit.

oil-hog	At the same time, economist Paul Krugman is telling the Bush administration that the country cannot sustain an economy based on high consumption of oil as the U.S. imports close to 50% of its domestic needs and as the price of oil is intrinsically affected by a pattern he calls the 'oil-hog cycle,' the hogs being the Arab sheiks, Texas millionaires and other people who don't need more money.

prop up	Especially in the last ten years, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board's monetary policies have had the effect to prop up the stock market and to further shift the wealth from the poor to the rich. The continuation of the U.S. dependence on foreign oil has been the main reason for the U.S. to have its troops stationed in the Middle East.

devaluate	In order to partially correct the present economic anomalies Dean Baker has suggested the need to devaluate the U.S. dollar. This devaluation would eventually effect the balancing of the foreign trade deficit along with the opportunities for developing countries to buy more from the U.S. and have a fairer exchange of goods and services. In addition, Paul Krugman recommends that the Bush administration pursue an energy policy of conservation and diversification.

Chicago School	But the economic reality is so much different from what Dean Baker and Paul Krugman are proposing, and in fact both President George Bush Jr. and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld are strong proponents of the Chicago School of Economics, the school which produced Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman and with this noble man the beginning of the Free Market and Corporate Globalization.

present crisis	President Bush is still tinkering with the idea to have his oil friends drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. More importantly, in light of the present crisis of international terrorism, the Bush administration is pushing the vision of the Free Market by bringing wars and victories rather than to follow a vision of Fair Market by bringing peace and justice.

agenda	As the U.S. pushes the Free Market agenda of the transnational corporations so the U.S. defends this Free Market by beefing up its military power at home and abroad. The Free Market agenda supporting the property and intellectual rights of the transnational corporations will take care of the U.S. foreign trade deficit, and a foreign trade surplus will be created as more military exports will fatten the pockets of the few and privileged.

54% of all arms sold by United States	The social and economic implications of the proliferation of arms and the hegemony of the U.S. can be appreciated by the following statistics:
54% of all arms sold by United States	Pentagon expenditure were $295 billion in 2000, could hit $375 billion in 2001 and could reach $400 billion in 2002 The United States supplied arms or military technology to more than 92% of the conflicts under way in 1999 1999 world military expenditures topped $780 billion. While at the same time an estimated 1.3 billion people survive on less than the equivalent of U.S. $1 a day The U.S. share in world arms exports rose from 35% in 1990 to 54% in 1999

---------------References
	The Chicago boys and the Chilean 'economic miracle.' Pinochet and Chile: Dedicated to Pinochet's victims around the world http://www.lakota.clara.net/myths/economy.html

	The Facts of militarization, Federation of American Scientists http://www.fas.org/asmp/fast_facts.htm

	THE NEW ECONOMY GOES BUST: WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS, by Dean Baker, October 29, 2001 http://www.cepr.net/new_economy_goes_bust.htm

	The Oil-Hog Cycle, by Paul Krugman, November 18, 2001, The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/18/opinion/18KRUG.html

	Recognize the link between oil, war, SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD, November 18, 2001 http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/opinion/47010_energyed.shtml

	Runaway Pentagon spending will do more harm than good. The arms companies must be happy. By Frida Berrigan and William D. Hartung, October 23, 2001 http://www.progressive.org/pmp0701/pmpbo2301.html